Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 
 
 Home
 Forums
  Register
  Active Topics
  Active Polls
  Members
  Forum Search
  FAQ
 Nanotechnology
 News
 Definitions
 About Nanalyze
 All Forums
 Nanotechnology General Discussion
 General Nanotechnology Discussion
 Howto make little even smaller
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Author Topic  

bonechair
Nano Newbie


1 Posts
 
04/23/2010
07:57:03

 View Profile |  Reply
Hey I was thinking about nanotechnology a while ago and would like to share what I thought on how to achieve it. Would it be possible to create a machine that can make ten duplicate copies of itself but smaller and then those ten can do the same untill they are small enough? Then those nano machines are programmed to create a nano chip to your design. Just a thought.

RCPLax41
New Poster


24 Posts
 
04/24/2010
18:04:29

 View Profile |  Reply
Nice idea. Been reading up on m-theory?

Edited by - RCPLax41 on 04/24/2010 18:13:16
Go to Top of Page

jon-attend
Nano Newbie


3 Posts
 
08/05/2010
08:46:45

 View Profile |  Reply
Bad Idea
do you know that a ant at the human size would not be able to walk on her thin legs she has...
at different scales we have diferent physical properties and different working points...
so a machine cannot copy itself bigger or smaller

Nanotechnologies, are now a topic of discussion more then microtechology because at this scale (10nm-100nm) there are a huge amout of physical properties that changes, the energy interaction is different.
So let say: If you want to create an animal, it will rather have no legs anymore, and moving using some electric flow, maybe...
but it is rather like: you cannot do it.

Let's remind you that nature is a good reference in what is possible or not, because it is working for far more years then we do...

and a neuron size is usually about 10–25 micrometers in diameter...

Now use your humanity to create dreams, not your technique.

Jonathan
Go to Top of Page

jon-attend
Nano Newbie


3 Posts
 
08/05/2010
09:26:38

 View Profile |  Reply
Let me explain this m-theory

but before, I have to say that using dimentions is like juggling balls
juggling three ball is easy
(Well, for those who like Viktor Kee or Stefan Sing, some people do it better then others... :D )
juggling 11 balls is very hard (max 50 people in the world can flash -11 throws- and one or two can juggle -22throws- on lucky days),
these are years (decades) of hard work

ok then:
these 11 dimentions there are max 50 people who can use it,
And these people are working so hard on it for such a long time.
so appretiate it as intertainement and not as some real-life stuffs,

greets,

Jonathan



Go to Top of Page

RCPLax41
New Poster


24 Posts
 
08/05/2010
15:33:07

 View Profile |  Reply
I was referring to entanglement and symmetry.
Try looking into a kaleidoscope - have fun!
Go to Top of Page

jon-attend
Nano Newbie


3 Posts
 
08/17/2010
07:16:04

 View Profile |  Reply
kaleidoscopes for sure do not work bellow 1um:
We have light interferences...

that illustrates very well the topic :)





Go to Top of Page

RCPLax41
New Poster


24 Posts
 
08/17/2010
16:56:34

 View Profile |  Reply
I suppose it would depend on the what type of microscope (kaleidoscope) one looks through
Go to Top of Page
  Topic  
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
Nanalyze Forums © Nanalyze Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000